Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration423 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1154
109% 904 Pts
64-Core 2,348
145% 2,348 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 118
Parallax 119
97% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 119
97% 119 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 801 597 826 892 871 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 3,665
Mixed 2,198
SusWrite 890
502% 2,220 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 48.6
236% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 1054
813% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 261%
Great: 486%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
516GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1590 1403 1367 1350 1304 1268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,576
Write 1,999
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 1,380
433% 1,935 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 93.1
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 1,144
862% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 336%
Great: 410%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
227GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 364 363 364 364 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 362
Mixed 320
SusWrite 364
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 39.3
136% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 170
137% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 103%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: P1225C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 414 415 416 415 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 473
Write 401
Mixed 315
SusWrite 414
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 23.1
77% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 163
131% 184 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 105%
Adata SD700X 1TB
768GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 324 289 315 318 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 361
Write 318
Mixed 314
SusWrite 314
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 26.8
87% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 78.4
79% 130 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 245 252 245 245 251 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 54
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 48.4
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 33.8
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 45.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 135%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback