Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '17 at 09:49
Run Duration	534 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 155 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 222 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 31.1 28% 30 fps	MRender 35.9 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 31.9 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 430 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 366 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 198 198 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 101 (C2) HDA temperature 68 58 180389609504	61.6% Good	Read 487 Write 257 Mixed 270 74% 338 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 7.14 60% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 34.6 75% 156 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$35 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 686GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 127 4033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2242 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4413 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2210 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2512 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 33068 (C2) HDA temperature 116 101 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	83.6% Excellent	Read 150 Write 141 Mixed 125 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.75 4K Mixed 0.25 115% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 85%
WD WD2500BUCT-63TWBY0 250GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 196GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 146 140 1691 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 233 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11777 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 219 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 167 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 65 (C2) HDA temperature 116 98 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	35.8% Below average	Read 62 Write 63 Mixed 62.6 47% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.16 40% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 37%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 122GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 90 (03) Spinup time 169 162 6541 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3902 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4934 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2875 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 845 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 36061 (C2) HDA temperature 121 99 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.7% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 62.2 Mixed 66.8 50% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.05 13% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 124GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Read 29.1 Write 24 Mixed 6.4 23% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.05 5% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 35GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 108 Write 16.3 Mixed 24.2 45% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.71 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 1.46 142% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 39%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB 452 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 5GB free, PID null Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.86% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 3.88 Mixed 5.71 9% 9.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.37 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.67 53% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.86% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339J.M8F Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.5 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $72

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	875x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	597x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	356x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	255x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	99x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	46x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16