______________________ ______________________

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
System______________________ ______________________  (all builds)
Motherboard______ _________________________
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 07:42
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 287
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 1,094
96% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 178
Parallax 184
143% 179 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 160
Splatting 133
130% 164 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 303 308 57 57 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 464
Write 392
Mixed 15
SusWrite 133
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
190GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 126 126 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 124
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 124
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 32.6
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 30.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ______________________ Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: ______________________ ______________________

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback