Sony VGNFW590F3B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony VGNFW590F3B  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 35
2-Core 69.1
39% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 69
8-Core 68.9
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 70
4% 70 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Sony(104D 9035) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 2.2
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232L9SA60 320GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC4OC30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 64 63 60 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 11.7
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 57.5
29% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VGNFW590F3B Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Sony VGNFW590F3B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback