HP Pavilion Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 626
71% 553 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 96.6
Parallax 86.3
77% 92.5 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 76.3
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 92 91 86 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 739
Write 140
Mixed 259
SusWrite 91.2
67% 307 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 9.2
115% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 212
167% 238 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback