Positivo POS-PIG41BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemPositivo POS-PIG41BA  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIG41BA
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 19:30
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 84.5
35% 58 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 170
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 124 114 105 69 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 122
Write 82.5
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 103
21% 93 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 9.6
41% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 10.7
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 13 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
112GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 22 11 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 78.1
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 40.3
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIG41BA Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIG41BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback