MSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 192
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 376
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 77.6
49% 64.2 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 42.9
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 32 35 6.8 51 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 482
Write 375
Mixed 317
SusWrite 49.4
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 90.6
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
13% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 98%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 91 90 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 130
Write 103
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 90.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.8
270% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI A320M BAZOOKA (MS-7A38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback