Medion MD34257/C794

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34257/C794  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 13:34
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 664
72% 569 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 9438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
54% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 61.7
55% 65.2 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 59.5
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 429 423 426 401 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 407
Mixed 382
SusWrite 418
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 44.1
143% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 324
244% 326 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34257/C794 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion MD34257/C794

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback