Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca) 12,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Memory 18.7 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 59.3 20% 36.1 Pts	4-Core 84.5 8-Core 98.7 12% 91.6 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8245) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.27% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.5 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.27% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 19 17 27 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 108 Write 146 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 22.4 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0 62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron CT8G3S186DM.M16FP 1x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.7 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 330 12% 330 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 32%, 12,494 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	1x
CT8G3S186DM.M16FP 1x8GBMicronBench 17%, 6 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16