Toshiba SATELLITE L750

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L750  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110517
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 05:53
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 106
49% 79 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 175
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2
2% 3 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 2.2
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 312 310 312 312 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 382
Write 453
Mixed 309
SusWrite 322
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 41.2
116% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 333
247% 328 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273DM0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L750 Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback