Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 13:41
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 36.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
60% 118 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 409
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.9% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 80.6
48% 66.5 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 43.4
44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 405 397 401 268 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 385
Write 386
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 272
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 12.1
65% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 12.4
13% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
206GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 105 107 108 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 118
Write 127
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 106
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 77 80 77 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 75.4
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 76
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 128 129 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 71.2
Write 114
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 127
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 66%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 104 105 111 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 70.7
Write 94.5
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 105
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0420 DDR3 1600G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0420 DDR3 1600G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback