ECS H61H2-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS H61H2-M2  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 11:39
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 156
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 310
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 19 47 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 59.7
Write 44.1
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 40.3
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 42%
Maxtor 6E040T0 40GB
15GB free
Firmware: NAN51680
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 45 46 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 57
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 45.7
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-M2 Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M2 - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback