HP h9-1101el

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP h9-1101el  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 06:53
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 99
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 500
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
HP(103C 6886) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.932.5.5000
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 22.5
11% 18.2 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 12.3
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
67GB free
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 207 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 173
Write 228
Mixed 211
SusWrite 132
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 15.1
64% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 15.3
54% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 70 68 72 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 67.5
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
166GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 112
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 131
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 112%
ASolid USB 32GB
29GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 32
Write 10
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 11.6
21% 18 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
77% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 35%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 139 138 139 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 134
Mixed 75
SusWrite 139
165% 125 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.1
420% 5.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 1.1
448% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1101el Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP h9-1101el

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback