HP Presario V6000 (RV306UA#ABL)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario V6000 (RV306UA#ABL)  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30BB
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070202
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 23:30
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo T2350
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 19
2-Core 37.5
28% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 37.5
8-Core 36.8
5% 37.2 Pts
64-Core 37
2% 37 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHW2120BH 120GB-$32
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8918
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 5.7 8 11 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 17.6
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 10.8
15% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 33%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.1 6.1 5.9 6.1 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 22
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6
9% 9.07 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
3.46% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 0.8
MC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.33 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback