Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 21:48
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 457
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 405
Mixed 412
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 41.3
147% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 90.7
97% 163 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
118GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 363
Write 225
Mixed 306
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 15.3
73% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 53.2
62% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.2
Write 79.7
Mixed 86.6
62% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
690GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 66.1
Mixed 62.5
49% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.25
89% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 148
Write 130
Mixed 119
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.26
95% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 96%
WD WD40EURD-14TSBY0 4TB
505GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 84.8
Write 77.4
Mixed 80.4
61% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.23
77% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
446GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 101
Write 131
Mixed 115
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.25
89% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
115GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 84.7
Write 67.7
Mixed 75.1
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.13
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD5H Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback