HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 22:14
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 171
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 463
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.3
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 406 421 420 436 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 435
Write 151
Mixed 252
SusWrite 417
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 27.9
98% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 142
151% 248 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 108%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
290GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 77.6
Write 73.3
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 101
49% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-193.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback