MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 19:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 193
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 504
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 451 437 450 442 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 455
Mixed 384
SusWrite 446
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 35.7
133% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 121%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
24GB free
Firmware: V5DOA73A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 59.4
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 61
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 35%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.2 3.1 3 3.3 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 8.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3.2
10% 7.28 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback