Default A116C1_1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault A116C1_1  (all builds)
MotherboardEii A116C1_1
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 18:10
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3950
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 30.2
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 74.3
27% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 142
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KUU-128GB 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0205A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 200 196 115 70 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 224
Write 201
Mixed 206
SusWrite 138
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 11.7
63% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 40.4
69% 135 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44%
Great: 58%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 14.2
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 18.2
19% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A116C1_1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Default A116C1_1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback