Asus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 14:52
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 431
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Sapphire(1DA2 E437) ≥ 4GB; SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6800 16G
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 172
Parallax 381
142% 243 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 127
Splatting 209
168% 206 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 216 210 258 42 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 582
Write 650
Mixed 554
SusWrite 208
112% 498 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 46.4
151% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 443
380% 562 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 141%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
42GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 244 64 65 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 220
Mixed 268
SusWrite 147
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 48.2
167% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 238
206% 305 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 126%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
212GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 102 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 27.7
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 101
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
186GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 33.5
Mixed 44
SusWrite 101
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
7GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 65
Write 29.7
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 101
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
4GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.8
Write 49.6
Mixed 55.7
43% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 99 101 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 92.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 99.1
46% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 58%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 750GB
156GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 99 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 92.3
130% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.5
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING Builds (Compare 2,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-G GAMING - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback