HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 23 months ago.

System	HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3577
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '22 at 10:16
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 45.5 1-Core 14 2-Core 21.3 21% 26.9 Pts	4-Core 28.2 8-Core 27.2 4% 27.7 Pts	64-Core 27.4 2% 27.4 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3577) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 101 21 47 10 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 323 Write 299 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 76.4 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 1 22% 7.67 MB/s	DQ Read 58.1 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 29.5 23% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 85%
Fujitsu MHT2080BH 80GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 28GB free Firmware: 0000104B SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 23.1 Mixed 18.1 SusWrite 19.4 16% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 19%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 32GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 29GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.79% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 15.9 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 12.9 21% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 41% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.79% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston HP536726-H41-ELCUW 6GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Presario CQ57 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	32x
Celeron B800IntelBench 40%, 2,662 samples	29x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	21x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	74x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	33x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	12x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	8x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16