Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 19:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 756
73% 601 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Z (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 1078) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 125
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 60.8
102% 79.8 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 43.4
44% 55.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,289
Write 1,174
Mixed 1,191
272% 1,218 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 35.1
202% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 51.7
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 33.8
84% 164 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 193%
Great: 283%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
189GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 783
Write 751
Mixed 559
155% 697 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 25.3
126% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 18.2
26% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 117%
Great: 372%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 317
Write 236
Mixed 242
199% 265 MB/s
4K Read 5.36
4K Write 3.66
4K Mixed 0.5
347% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 159%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3333 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2652 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 49.7
MC Mixed 52.7
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 24
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 135%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback