Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 150 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 571 51% 431 Pts	64-Core 828 51% 828 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000 1,173 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 473.47 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.9% Average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 52.8 Parallax 74.3 42% 59.7 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 50.4 47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 146 153 162 161 147 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.5% Above average	Read 239 Write 223 Mixed 203 SusWrite 160 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 24.8 83% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 169 127% 168 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB 1,220 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 910GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 22 22 21 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 90% Great: 307%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 166GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 3.5 3.7 4.5 6.6 7.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
WD Elements 107C 5TB 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 360GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 24.4 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 23.1 32% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 58GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16