Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	40.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '22 at 21:25
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 0 17 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 48.6 1-Core 56.9 2-Core 132 44% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 375 41% 323 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 69%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 289 Write 30.4 Mixed 166 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.1 27% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 852GB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 83.1 Write 23.9 Mixed 41.7 37% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 128%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 351GB free Firmware: 1201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 12.5 Write 7.8 Mixed 10.9 8% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB 2,421 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 65.5 Write 56.6 Mixed 22.2 57% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 200GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 58.7 Write 67.9 Mixed 29.1 65% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5173QH0- M391B5173QH0- M391B5173QH0- M391B5173QH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5173QH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5173QH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273CH0- M391B5273... 64GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.5% Above average	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 24.7 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
SSDSC2CT080A4 80GBIntelBench 60%, 377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GBHynixBench 89%, 32 samples	2x
M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 17 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4... 64GBSamsungBench 84%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $122

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16