Lenovo 80SY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80SY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 101
48% 76 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 160
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 520
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 202 197 252 279 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 388
Mixed 390
SusWrite 255
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 45.4
153% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 570
422% 564 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 108%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
298GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 78 82 79 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 77.7
Write 80.9
Mixed 49
SusWrite 78
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Z Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SY Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback