Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	2.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '22 at 16:57
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Core2 Duo T7700 28 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 56.6 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 118 47% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 138 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 537GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 474GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 78 Write 57.5 Mixed 69.8 15% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.7 9% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x3GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 1 slots used 3GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.5% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 0.2 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16