Lenovo 80MQ

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Lenovo 80MQ (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lancer 5B9
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '22 at 08:12
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD QC-4000 242 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 36.1 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 39.7 21% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 58.9 8-Core 60.1 8% 59.5 Pts	64-Core 57 4% 57 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8280 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3 Parallax 2 1% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 113 59 67 67 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.3% Below average	Read 224 Write 268 Mixed 165 SusWrite 110 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 11.2 46% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 64.1 53% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 185GB free Firmware: AM0Q5E SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 84 86 85 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 50 Write 67.1 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 83.8 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.1 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80MQ Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80MQ

CPU
QC-4000AMDBench 26%, 242 samples	19x

GPU
HD 8280AMDBench 1%, 1,831 samples	19x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	6x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	4x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16