MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B61
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 05:21
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 719
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 126
Parallax 116
96% 120 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 123
Splatting 107
91% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
549GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 418 433 442 444 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 472
Mixed 440
SusWrite 439
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.5
204% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 79 37 3 3.2 7 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 440
Write 157
Mixed 67
SusWrite 22.5
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 18.2
72% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 7.8
27% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
264GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 98 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 96.8
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 109%
ProGrade SD PG06 64GB
48GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41% Average
Read 92.4
Write 77.8
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 82.1
104% 78 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.6
236% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVR 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.9
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) Builds (Compare 7,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback