Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP301
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 00:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 180
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 242
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(3100 0002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.9
6% 5.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 262 134 135 133 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 441
Write 434
Mixed 421
SusWrite 183
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 41.2
149% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 246
176% 220 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston RB32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback