TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Inspiron 6000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemDell Inspiron 6000  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0W9260
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20050627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 23:11
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.60GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 41.2
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 14.9
19% 23.5 Pts
4-Core 14.2
8-Core 14
2% 14.1 Pts
64-Core 14.7
1% 14.7 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 21.6%
 Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sobetter Ext 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 8.9
Mixed 5.7
124% 174 MB/s
4K Read 111
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
4,833% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 30%
Toshiba MK6026GAX 60GB
46GB free
Firmware: PA202D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 22 29 29 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 27.6
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 27.9
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 15.5%
 Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 5.99%
 Great: 20%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback