Asus F2A85-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A85-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '22 at 18:45
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 51.3 1-Core 62.6 2-Core 106 43% 73.5 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 138 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 41.7 Parallax 39.4 35% 41.4 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 43 Splatting 28 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 245 84 78 74 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 339 Write 212 Mixed 233 SusWrite 124 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 23.4 88% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 167 137% 195 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 844GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 27 28 27 26 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 31.3 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 27.5 19% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 10.9 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 8.5 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A85-V PRO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-V PRO - $165

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	25x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	18x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	9x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CF8 Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 M378B5673FH0-CF8 M378B5673FH0-CF8 12GBSamsungBench 29%, 18 samples	8x
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 43%, 130 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16