Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 09:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Memory 14.3
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 25.6
11% 17.9 Pts
4-Core 43.9
8-Core 67.2
7% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 66.5
4% 66.5 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 5.2
4% 8.83 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 4
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P5 500GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 797 1091 1112 1172 904 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,277
Write 1,186
Mixed 1,182
SusWrite 1,044
264% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 27.1
89% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 93.6
70% 94.1 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 147%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 5
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 366
11% 366 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback