Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 19:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 193
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 462
52% 406 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.1
7% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 199 192 181 180 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 446
Write 443
Mixed 425
SusWrite 207
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 40.3
136% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 351
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-152.A00LF 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback