HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E9
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 13:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 238
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 610
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 50.8
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 73.7
41% 60.7 fps
MRender 54.7
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 42.6
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0204 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 271 273 280 284 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 367
Write 282
Mixed 261
SusWrite 277
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 20.4
78% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 34.6
58% 112 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 277%
WD My Passport 2627 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 88.1
Write 103
Mixed 66
SusWrite 102
124% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 28.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 65W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback