ECS Z77H2-AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardECS Z77H2-AX  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 09:03
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 172
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 508
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 7B93) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 51
Parallax 31.7
32% 40.5 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35.6
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126KB
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 340
Write 145
Mixed 190
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 22.2
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 32.5
25% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
667GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 150 153 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 141
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 150
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MLK64V6H Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 TS512MLK64V6H Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77H2-AX Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS Z77H2-AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback