Biostar B550MX/E PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar B550MX/E PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 06:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 57.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 312
91% 176 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 853
88% 708 Pts
64-Core 1081
67% 1081 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 107
Parallax 109
95% 111 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.1
57% 65 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ransor Starlink 500GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A2S8MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 1250 1928 1920 1976 711 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,558
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,401
SusWrite 1,336
415% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 96.1
328% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,291
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 576
579% 940 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 336%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMRA4U300JJJM-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550MX/E PRO Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Biostar B550MX/E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback