Arcelik-a.s. GNB-1589-B1-i5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemArcelik-a.s. GNB-1589-B1-i5  (all builds)
MotherboardARCELIK-A.S.
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 01:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 43%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 139
58% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 214
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Quanta(152D 1107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 6.5
4% 7.33 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.6
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 123 132 128 118 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 421
Write 357
Mixed 291
SusWrite 143
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 15
70% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 36.1
48% 87.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 0420 AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 18.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GNB-1589-B1-i5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik-a.s. GNB-1589-B1-i5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback