PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus AM1I-A (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160310 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 02 '22 at 16:43 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
|
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 347 376 357 405 406 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
233GB free
Firmware: V5DOA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 62 63 63 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples | 19x |
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples | 11x |
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 30%, 515 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples | 24x |
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 2x |
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 8% - Terrible | Total price: $38 |