Acer Veriton N4640G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton N4640G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton N4640G(KBL)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 16:39
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$86
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 395
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 246 209 232 222 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 426
Write 364
Mixed 379
SusWrite 240
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 39.4
138% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 314
238% 321 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 32 26 29 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 65%
NORELSYS 1081 125GB
80GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 21 23 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 25
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 21.6
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4
257% 4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton N4640G Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton N4640G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback