Asus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 12:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 571
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 45.5
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 33.3
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anacomda A1S 120GB SSD
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 173 172 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66% Good
Read 468
Write 170
Mixed 221
SusWrite 168
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 25.1
101% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 113
93% 131 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
6.5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 217 233 231 230 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback