Asus K55VJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus K55VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55VJ
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20121001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 09:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 158
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 380
43% 338 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1447) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 201 7 5.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 449
Write 239
Mixed 304
SusWrite 79.9
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 21.6
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 37
74% 148 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55VJ Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback