TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 02:37
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6346
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 242
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 808
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 78.1%
 Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A40-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 14D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 129GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 162 149 153 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 161
Mixed 183
SusWrite 155
134% 180 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 5.5
941% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
216% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 138
MC Mixed 80.9
261% 91.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 13.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 216%
 Great: 143%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 53201stBench 47%, 5 samples4x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 63461stBench 64%, 4 samples3x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6242R1stBench 62%, 8 samples2x
GPU
A16-2BNvidiaBench 32%, 22 samples2x
A40-8QNvidiaBench 46%, 13 samples2x
A16-1BNvidiaBench 30%, 10 samples2x
RAM
Hat 2x16GBRedBench 78%, 105 samples5x
Hat 1x8GBRedBench 58%, 330 samples5x
Hat 4x16GBRedBench 91%, 50 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback