Dell Precision M4700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M4700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02PR7R
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 16:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 456
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 Mobility Pro Graphics
Dell(1028 053E) 1GB
Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 12.5
7% 11.6 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 239 221 212 212 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.6% Good
Read 252
Write 238
Mixed 227
SusWrite 222
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 30.6
99% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 200
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
694GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 21.4
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 27
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4700 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback