ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 94Y7614

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	IBM 94Y7614 (all builds)
Memory	137.4 GB free of 144 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180604
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '22 at 16:14
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 58.8 2-Core 119 54% 86.4 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 329 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 141 144 140 138 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 310 Write 206 Mixed 227 SusWrite 144 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 33.2 113% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 98 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 109 85% 115 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 84%
Hitachi HUC101818CS4204 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: FK06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 64 62 64 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 227 Write 62.6 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 62.9 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.6 293% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18x8GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 18 of 18 slots used 144GB DIMM Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback