Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGIGABYTE FWPW-QUAD-WIFI-SW
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MKHM17P-SI  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 12:37
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 507
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
Gigabyte(1458 D003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 34.5
27% 35.6 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 30.3
25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M390 500GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1557 2067 2062 2254 907 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,522
Write 2,049
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 1,501
368% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 70
253% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1104
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 768
588% 812 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 267%
Great: 321%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MKHM17P-SI Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback