MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 327
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 955
92% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$383
Gainward(10B0 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 177
Parallax 196
145% 184 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 154
Splatting 128
125% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 473
Mixed 358
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 53
187% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 261
222% 326 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
246GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 484
Mixed 412
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.9
217% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 368
266% 340 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
731GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,160
Write 61
Mixed 114
2,703% 3,778 MB/s
4K Read 853
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.4
35,829% 286 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 154
Mixed 75.4
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
131GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 105
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 43.7
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 34.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 41.9
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $891
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback