bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 06:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 178
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 433
48% 377 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 280
Sapphire(174B A003) 3GB
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 52.8
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 23.8
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 111 110 111 105 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 264
Write 150
Mixed 178
SusWrite 103
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 32.6
106% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 121
94% 129 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
459GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 202 204 204 204 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 200
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 204
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 116%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-401.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback