Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T936

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T936  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB295
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 05:34
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 163
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 217
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6951
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.47 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.2
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00007 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0106Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 287 352 328 321 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 357
Write 158
Mixed 224
SusWrite 319
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 16.7
60% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 278
224% 317 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
A-Tech 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK T936 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T936

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback