Intel H55AD17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel H55AD17  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 01:03
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 140
61% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 277
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 17.1
15% 17.8 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 15.8
15% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OCP0S3128B-A0 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 120 115 65 51 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.9% Above average
Read 253
Write 186
Mixed 213
SusWrite 95
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 24.3
89% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 151
125% 180 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 1TB
362GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 28 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 26
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 26.9
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55AD17 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55AD17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback