TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Extracomputer D3220-B1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemExtracomputer D3220-B1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3220-B1
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 21:46
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 74.4
45% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 132
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 45%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 4001)
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 137
Parallax 141
98% 133 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
111% 140 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 235 282 205 104 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60% Good
Read 434
Write 446
Mixed 347
SusWrite 209
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 25
89% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 33.3
31% 46 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 60%
 Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
856GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 285 412 413 365 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 336
Write 416
Mixed 352
SusWrite 345
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 35.4
110% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 46.5
37% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 71.6%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
490GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 124 126 126 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 99.7
Write 102
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 122
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 63.5%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 47.3%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical D3220-B1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Extracomputer D3220-B1

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel  $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples4x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples4x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples4x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples5x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples3x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples3x
SSD
B5 240GBTextormBench 56%, 215 samples4x
SATA SSD 3TG6-P 240GB2.5"Bench 72%, 15 samples4x
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples2x
RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBMicronBench 54%, 41 samples3x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,312 samples3x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback