MSI B75A-G43 (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI B75A-G43 (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 384
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 116 107 106 106 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 414
Write 418
Mixed 351
SusWrite 111
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 32.2
107% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 170
151% 227 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75A-G43 (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI B75A-G43 (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback